EPA Draft Says MTBE a 'Likely' Cause of Cancer
Chicago its has 0.8% of MTBE in gasolines
Mexico City it has 8% of MTBE in gasolines
CONTACT: Bill Walker, (510) 444-0973 x301; EWG Public Affairs, (202) 667-6982
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: July 11, 2005
WASHINGTON, July 11 — A EPA draft risk assessment says MTBE, the gasoline additive that has contaminated drinking water in at least 29 states, is a "likely" human carcinogen, according to agency sources.
An EPA official who reviewed an earlier version of the document told Environmental Working Group (EWG) that the risk assessment's most notable finding for the first time links MTBE to cancers such as leukemia and lymphoma, with toxicological endpoints similar to known carcinogens such as benzene and butadiene. Previously, EPA had classified MTBE as a "possible" cause of cancer, and concerns about contamination centered on the fact that in small doses its foul stench renders water undrinkable.
The EPA official said the document's authors completed their draft more than a year ago. It has been circulating within the agency for review and has already been approved by the Office of Research and Development's National Center for Environmental Assessment. Once all EPA divisions have signed off on it, it must still go through external review.
"People have been trying to get this out of the agency forever," said the official.
If approved, the finding will rock the current debate in Congress over whether the oil companies who make and use MTBE should be held responsible for cleaning up drinking water contaminated by the chemical leaking from underground gasoline storage tanks. According to state water agencies' records compiled by EWG, MTBE has been detected in more than 1,800 water systems across the country.
The American Water Works Association and the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies released studies last month estimating nationwide cleanup costs at between $25 billion and $33 billion, and possibly reaching $85 billion. The finding that MTBE is a likely carcinogen would add urgency to cleanup efforts, causing costs to soar.
The House has passed an energy bill, pushed by Majority Leader Tom DeLay of Texas, that would bar communities and water systems from suing MTBE makers for knowingly manufacturing and distributing a defective product — even though documents from two California lawsuits show the oil industry knew as early as 1979 that the compound was a threat to water supplies but still pushed for its use as a gasoline additive to make fuel burn cleaner.
"We knew the idea to exempt MTBE makers from lawsuits was bad news for taxpayers. Now EPA is learning how dangerous it would be for public health," said EWG President Ken Cook. "No matter how the risk assessment finally comes out, this is clearly not the time to be letting the makers of this chemical off the hook."
Methyl tert-butyl ether
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Methyl tert-butyl ether | |
---|---|
Identifiers | |
CAS number | 1634-04-4 |
PubChem | 15413 |
ChemSpider | 14672 |
KEGG | C11344 |
ChEBI | CHEBI:27642 |
Jmol-3D images | Image 1 |
Properties | |
Molecular formula | C5H12O |
Molar mass | 88.15 g mol−1 |
Density | 0.7404 g/cm³ |
Melting point | -109 °C, 164 K, -164 °F |
Boiling point | 55.2 °C, 328 K, 131 °F |
Solubility in water | 26 g/L (20 °C)[1] |
Hazards | |
NFPA 704 | |
Flash point | −10 °C (14 °F) |
(verify) (what
is: / ?) Except where noted otherwise, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C, 100 kPa) | |
Infobox references |
Methyl
tert-butyl ether, also known as methyl tertiary butyl ether
and MTBE, is an organic compound with molecular formula
(CH3)3COCH3. MTBE is a volatile, flammable, and
colorless liquid that is sparingly soluble[1] in water. It
has a minty odor vaguely reminiscent of diethyl ether, leading to unpleasant taste and
odor in water. MTBE is a gasoline
additive, used as an oxygenate to
raise the octane number. Its use is controversial in the US
and declining in that country in part because of its occurrence in groundwater and legislation
favoring ethanol. Worldwide production of MTBE has been constant at about 18
million tons/y (2005) owing to growth in Asian markets which are less subject to
ethanol subsidies.[2]
Contents[hide] |
Production and properties
MTBE is manufactured via
the chemical
reaction of methanol and isobutylene. Methanol is derived
from natural gas, and isobutylene is derived from butane obtained from crude oil or natural gas, thus MTBE is derived from fossil
fuels. In the United States, it was produced in very large quantities (more than
200,000 barrels (32,000 m3) per day in 1999) during its use as a fuel
additive.
Uses
MTBE is almost exclusively
used as a fuel component in fuel for gasoline engines. It is one of a group of chemicals
commonly known as oxygenates
because they raise the oxygen content of
gasoline.
As anti-knocking agent
In the US it has been used
in gasoline at low levels since 1979 to replace tetraethyl lead and to
increase its octane
rating helping prevent engine knocking. Oxygenates help gasoline burn
more completely, reducing tailpipe emissions from
pre-1984 motor vehicles; dilutes or displaces gasoline components such as
aromatics (e.g., benzene) and sulfur;
and optimizes the oxidation during combustion. Most refiners chose MTBE over
other oxygenates primarily for its blending characteristics and low cost.
Alternatives to MTBE as an anti-knock agent
Other compounds are
available as additives for gasoline including ethanol and some ethers such as tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME).
Ethanol has been
advertised as a safe alternative by the agricultural and other interest groups
in the USA and Europe. It has been proposed that as a polar solvent, ethanol may
separate nonpolar hydrocarbons from the gasoline, a problem that MTBE does
appear to cause. Some volatile hydrocarbons in gasoline vapors are carcinogens, and gasoline vapors
produce photochemical smog. Ethanol's higher cost
requires government intervention in the form of subsidies or mandated usage to
be competitive. In 2003, California was the first U.S. state to start replacing
MTBE with ethanol. Several other states started switching soon thereafter.
Advocates of both sides of
the debate in the United States sometimes claim that gasoline manufacturers have
been forced to add MTBE to gasoline by law. It might be more correct to say they
have been induced to do so, although any oxygenate would fulfill the law.
An alternative to straight
ethanol is the related ether ETBE, which is manufactured from ethanol and isobutene.
Its performance as an additive is similar to MTBE, but due to the higher price
of ethanol compared to methanol, it is more expensive.
Higher quality gasoline is
also an alternative, i.e., so that additives such as MTBE are unnecessary. Iso-octane itself
is used. MTBE plants can be retrofitted to produce iso-octane from
isobutylene.[3],[4]
As a solvent
As a solvent, MTBE
possesses one distinct advantage over most ethers - it has a reduced tendency to
form explosive organic
peroxides. Opened bottles of diethyl ether or THF can build up dangerous levels of these
peroxides in months, whereas samples of MTBE are usually safe for years (but
they should still be tested periodically). For this reason (as well as its
higher boiling point), MTBE is used as a solvent extensively in industry, where
safety concerns and regulations make working with diethyl ether, THF, or other
ethers much more difficult and expensive. However, despite the popularity of
MTBE in industrial settings, it is rarely used as a solvent in academia with
some exceptions.[5]
Although an ether, MTBE is
a poor Lewis
base and does not support formation of Grignard reagents. It
is also unstable toward strong acids. It reacts dangerously with bromine.[8]
Persistence and pervasiveness in the environment
MTBE gives water an
unpleasant taste at very low concentrations, and thus can render large
quantities of groundwater non-potable. MTBE is often introduced into
water-supply aquifers by leaking underground storage tanks (USTs) at
gasoline stations or by gasoline containing MTBE spilled onto the ground. The
higher water solubility and persistence of MTBE cause it to travel faster and
farther than many other components of gasoline when released into an
aquifer.[9][10]
MTBE is biodegraded by the
action of bacteria. In the proper type of bioreactor, such as a fluidized bed bioreactor, MTBE can be rapidly and
economically removed from water to undetectable levels. Activated carbon
produced from coconut shells and optimized for MTBE adsorption can also reduce
MTBE to undetectable levels.[11]
Health risks
According to the IARC, a cancer
research agency of the World Health Organization, MTBE is
not classified as a human carcinogen. MTBE can be tasted in water at
concentrations of 5 – 15 µg/l.[12]
As of 2007, researchers
have limited data about the health effects of ingestion of MTBE. The United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has concluded that available data are
inadequate to quantify health risks of MTBE at low exposure levels in drinking
water, but that the data support the conclusion that MTBE is a potential human
carcinogen at high doses.[13]
Legislation and litigation in the U.S.
Main article: Methyl tert-butyl ether
controversy
MTBE removal from
groundwater and soil contamination in the U.S. is estimated
to cost from $1 billion[14]
to $30 billion,[15]
including removing the compound from aquifers and municipal water supplies and
replacing leaky underground oil tanks. In one case, the cost to oil companies to
clean up the MTBE in wells belonging to Santa Monica is estimated to exceed $200
million.[16] In another case,
the City of New York estimated a $250 million cost for cleanup of a single
wellfield in Queens, NY.[17]
MTBE is banned in the US
states of California and New York, starting January 1, 2004.
As of September 2005, twenty-five states had signed legislation banning MTBE. (A
table of state by state information, as of 2002, is available at the United States Department of
Energy website.[18])
In 2000, the U.S. EPA drafted plans to phase out the use of MTBE nationwide
over four years. As of fall 2006, hundreds of lawsuits are still pending
regarding MTBE contamination of public and private drinking water supplies.
The Energy
Policy Act of 2005, passed in the U.S. House of Representatives, did not
include a provision for shielding MTBE manufacturers from water
contamination lawsuits. This provision was first proposed in 2003 and had
been thought by some to be a priority of Tom DeLay and Rep. Joe Barton, then chairman of the Energy and Commerce
Committee.[19]
This bill did include a provision that gives MTBE makers, including some major
oil
companies, $2 billion in transition assistance as MTBE is phased out over
the next nine years.[20]
Due to opposition in the Senate,[21]
the conference report dropped all MTBE provisions. The final bill was passed by
both houses and signed into law by President Bush.[22] The lack of MTBE
liability protection is resulting in a switchover to the use of ethanol as a
gasoline additive. Some traders and consumer advocates are blaming this for an
increase in gasoline prices.[23]
The U.S. EPA currently
lists MTBE as a candidate for a maximum contaminant level (MCL) in drinking water.[24] MCLs are
determined by the EPA using toxicity
data.
See also
- Ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE)
- tert-Amyl methyl ether (TAME)
- Tetraethyl lead (TEL)
References
- ^ a b Record in the GESTIS Substance Database from the IFA
- ^ M. Winterberg, E. Schulte-Korne, U. Peters, F. Nierlich "Methyl Tert-Butyl Ether" in Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, 2010, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim. doi:10.1002/14356007.a16_543.pub2
- ^ http://www.nesteengineering.com/default.asp?path=111,360,362,477
- ^ http://www.halliburton.com/kbr/hydroChem/petroChem/nexoctane.jsp
- ^ http://www.jlr.org/cgi/content/abstract/D700041-JLR200v1
- ^ Zeon Corportation
- ^ CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 90th edition
- ^ "Interaction between bromine and tert-butyl methyl ether". http://www.crhf.org.uk/incident09.html. Retrieved 13 May 2010.
- ^ http://www.handpmg.com/lustline31-mtbe-or-benzene.htm
- ^ San Francisco Bay Area Regional Water Quality Control Board Integrated Basin Management Plan (2004)
- ^ link text
- ^ Fischer A, Oehm C, Selle M, Werner P. (2005). "Biotic and abiotic transformations of methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE)". Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 12 (6): 381–6.. doi:10.1065/espr2005.08.277. PMID 16305145.
- ^ http://www.epa.gov/mtbe/faq.htm#concerns
- ^ SIGMA - Weekly Report
- ^ Long Island Utility Fighting to Defeat MTBE Safe Harbor - Napoli Bern - Attorneys
- ^ AmeriScan: February 17, 2005
- ^ Navarro, Mireya (2009-10-20). "City Awarded $105 Million in Exxon Mobil Lawsuit". The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/20/science/earth/20exxon.html. Retrieved 2010-05-12.
- ^ Website U.S. Department of Energy
- ^ http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/04/21/energy.bill.mtbe.ap/
- ^ http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7574562/+MTBE&hl=en
- ^ Charles Babington, House Again Passes GOP Energy Measures, Washington Post, June 16, 2004, at A4 (House passes Energy Bill, but Senate opponents of MTBE provision in House Bill have the votes to prevent its enactment).
- ^ http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:h.r.00006:
- ^ prices ethanol/index.htm?cnn=yes http://money.cnn.com/2006/04/18/news/economy/gas prices ethanol/index.htm?cnn=yes
- ^ CCL 2 List
External links
- EFOA
- MTBE webpage from the EPA
- Summary of health effects data from IACR
- Eliminating MTBE in Gasoline in 2006 (pdf)
- An online resource about MTBE litigation and the surrounding issues
- MTBE: What The Oil Companies Knew And When They Knew It (from the Environmental Working Group)
- MTBE Resource Guide
- European Union MTBE Risk Assessment Report
- Fuel Quality Directive Impact Assessment
- Council Directive 85/536/EEC of 5 December 1985 on crude-oil savings through the use of substitute fuel components in petrol
- An assessment of the impact of ethanol-blended petrol on the total NMVOC emission from road transport in selected countries
|
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario